| 1 |
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 10:28 -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
> Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 22:46 +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > > And how exactly does this help us in the event of say the OSL burning |
| 6 |
> > > down or the GNi suffering flooding? :) |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Well, we're on the second floor of the data center which has a quite |
| 10 |
> > large basement, which would likely absorb most of the water. About the |
| 11 |
> > only feasible way for our stuff to get flooded is if the San Andreas |
| 12 |
> > finally gets the "big one" and the west coast of the US falls into the |
| 13 |
> > Pacific, in which case, we'll be worried about other issues, I'm sure. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
3rd floor in C.06 actually. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> > That being said, you're more than welcome to assist Infrastructure (and |
| 18 |
> > the Foundation) in finding new hosting locations as well as the manpower |
| 19 |
> > to bring new services up in those locations or moving existing services. |
| 20 |
> > Doing moves like this is a bunch of work, and not something I feel we |
| 21 |
> > should be "dumping" on the Infrastructure team. |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> Can I assume this building has indoor plumbing? It can be on the top |
| 27 |
> floor and still get flooded. I saw a house once that the hot water |
| 28 |
> heater busted and water was about a foot deep and was coming out the |
| 29 |
> walls. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> More than one way to "flood" a building. :/ |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Flooding/burning etc are not likely to happen. See page two of the spec |
| 34 |
for more details. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
http://www.365main.com/images/365_Main_San_Francisco_CA.pdf |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 41 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives