1 |
All, |
2 |
|
3 |
it has been proposed to me that we create a "container" keyword for |
4 |
OpenRC init scripts, which would take the place of the various keywords |
5 |
we have currently for separate container types, such as lxc, |
6 |
systemd-nspawn, etc (basically the values RC_SYS can be set to). |
7 |
We would keep all of the current keywords for backward compatibility, |
8 |
but they would all become synonyms for container. |
9 |
The auto detection code would be updated to test for all supported |
10 |
container types at once. |
11 |
|
12 |
The down side of this would be that we would lose the ability to pick |
13 |
specific containers that a service could not run in; it would have to |
14 |
run in no containers or all containers. |
15 |
|
16 |
I don't know of specific services which can run in one container but not |
17 |
in another. However, if these types of services do exist, we can't make |
18 |
this change. |
19 |
|
20 |
Let me know what you think. |
21 |
|
22 |
Thanks, |
23 |
|
24 |
William |