From: | donnie berkholz <spyderous@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] 'Distro Day (Measuring the benefits of the Gentoo approach)' | ||
Date: | Thu, 14 Aug 2003 01:07:22 | ||
Message-Id: | 34297.172.130.207.3.1060823240.squirrel@spidermail.richmond.edu | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] "Distro Day (Measuring the benefits of the Gentoo approach)" by Mike Frysinger |
1 | On Wednesday 13 August 2003 15:02, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 | > On Wednesday 13 August 2003 15:00, Jon Portnoy wrote: |
3 | >> At the moment Zadeh and einride are working on ICC integration. |
4 | >> einride has some excellent ideas about Portage integration, so |
5 | >> hopefully that'll get us somewhere. |
6 | > |
7 | > hopefully the idea isnt icc-centric ... that is, it'll support say |
8 | > uclibc compiler, or dietlibc, or tcc, or what have you :) |
9 | > -mike |
10 | |
11 | Perhaps gcc-config should be expanded to toolchain-config ... |
12 | |
13 | |
14 | |
15 | -- |
16 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] 'Distro Day (Measuring the benefits of the Gentoo approach)' | Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] 'Distro Day (Measuring the benefits of the Gentoo approach)' | Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> |