Archives
Archives
| From: | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] How shall we name the EAPI 6 patch applying function? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:55:21 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20130403115609.68282afe@pomiocik.lan | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] How shall we name the EAPI 6 patch applying function? by "Michał Górny" |
||
| 1 | There was a slight mis-understanding between me and ulm. |
| 2 | |
| 3 | On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 11:14:37 +0200 |
| 4 | Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 | |
| 6 | > a) patch files can be specified directly or through a directory |
| 7 | > in which *all* files will be applied in lexical order, |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Correction: files which match '*.patch' and '*.diff'. This avoids |
| 10 | catching 'README' files, 'series' files and any reasonable kind |
| 11 | of backup files. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Best regards, |
| 15 | Michał Górny |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] How shall we name the EAPI 6 patch applying function? | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |