| 1 |
Chris Reffett wrote: |
| 2 |
> - -The QA team policymaking workflow will look like the following: |
| 3 |
.. |
| 4 |
> If we think a developer's actions are causing problems, we may ask |
| 5 |
> them to stop/undo pending discussion by the QA team at the next meeting. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
plus |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> - -Rules for the QA team editing peoples' packages: |
| 10 |
.. |
| 11 |
> *For trivial fixes, such as repoman errors, we fix the issue and send |
| 12 |
> the developer a friendly reminder |
| 13 |
> *For large but non-critical fixes, we open a bug, wait 2 weeks, and if |
| 14 |
> it is not fixed within that time frame we make the change. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
sounds to me like QA is giving itself carte blanche to make any "fix" |
| 17 |
they want as per "we think a developer's actions are causing problems" |
| 18 |
hmm? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
//Peter |
Archives