| 1 |
Ühel kenal päeval, L, 18.02.2017 kell 22:03, kirjutas Mart Raudsepp: |
| 2 |
> Ühel kenal päeval, L, 18.02.2017 kell 19:47, kirjutas Michał Górny: |
| 3 |
> > commit: 7207a292b2591dde5cbd336470bed3c11617a8e1 |
| 4 |
> > Commit: Michał Górny <mgorny <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> |
| 5 |
> > CommitDate: Sat Feb 18 19:47:25 2017 +0000 |
| 6 |
> > URL: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=72 |
| 7 |
> > 07 |
| 8 |
> > a292 |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > dev-util/wxglade: python-single-r1, EAPI=6 |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> While I appreciate work done to do this conversion finally, what was |
| 13 |
> the reason to bypass the maintainers after being explicitly told on |
| 14 |
> IRC |
| 15 |
> to not do so? |
| 16 |
> Since when have we entered a free-for-all state of maintenance in |
| 17 |
> Gentoo? |
| 18 |
> I would like to know the state of affairs, so I know for future |
| 19 |
> reference what can I expect and what I can do to packages that I do |
| 20 |
> not |
| 21 |
> explicitly maintain either. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> And yes, I am aware there was a pending bump request for a couple |
| 24 |
> years. I'm still dealing with backlog after getting back to tree |
| 25 |
> maintenance. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Mart Raudsepp, |
| 29 |
> thoroughly confused about current maintenance policies |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Hello? |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
wxglade was just one example that affected me, and actually a bad |
| 35 |
example, but I see constant commits to anything and everything by |
| 36 |
people not maintaining something, to teams that have not declared their |
| 37 |
packages open for fixing by anyone nor without Acked-by's; coupled with |
| 38 |
constant talks of everything being crap, ebuilds being retarded and |
| 39 |
whatnot. Not a very motivational speak, I must add. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
What is going on? Do I need to revise how I would judge an ebuild quiz |
| 42 |
question 12 answer for any future mentees? |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
Mart Raudsepp |
Archives