Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@g.o>
Cc: qa@g.o, gnome <gnome@g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-dev]
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 10:59:35
Message-Id: 1417777160.6787.7.camel@gentoo.org
1 Hi!
2
3 We found out that pulseaudio ebuild was modified by QA without QA
4 talking to the maintainers (gnome team) and without considering/updating
5 the relevant bugzilla issue at
6 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=519530
7
8 In that link it's explained a bit more why the ebuild was written in
9 that way and the problems we try to avoid. We have then hardmasked that
10 version until it's discussed THERE how to handle that situations.
11
12 And would really appreciate that next time we are even notified about a
13 change is going to be committed and don't need to see it in
14 packages.gentoo.org (well, in my case I am not all the time on IRC...
15 but I read the mail often and, also, Gilles and Leio can also be
16 contacted on IRC. You can also simply send a mail to the alias and give
17 us at least some days of timeout).
18
19 Thanks a lot

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o>
[gentoo-dev] Re: About reversion of last pulseaudio ebuild change Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>