| 1 |
On 10:27 Mon 02 Mar , Doug Goldstein wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > Is it safe to remove an entry from package.use (in profiles) if the |
| 5 |
> > package has an IUSE default for the respective flag? |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > To be more concrete, Emacs ebuilds have IUSE="+xpm" now, but we still |
| 8 |
> > have an entry "app-editors/emacs xpm" in profiles/base/package.use |
| 9 |
> > which I would like to remove. As I understand it, the two methods are |
| 10 |
> > adjacent in USE ordering, so nothing should change for users? |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Ulrich |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> Correct. Assuming the user has an EAPI=1 capable package manager, which at |
| 16 |
> this point in time they really should. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
If they don't, then they won't be able to install emacs anyway since all |
| 19 |
its ebuilds have EAPI 1. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Thanks, |
| 23 |
Donnie |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Donnie Berkholz |
| 26 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| 27 |
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com |
Archives