| 1 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi all, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I'm back for my yearly posting about creating a gentoo-dev-announce |
| 5 |
> list [1]. Fedora recently created a fedora-devel-announce list with a |
| 6 |
> great description of how it works, what's posted to it, etc [2], which |
| 7 |
> got me excited about making this happen in Gentoo. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Last time the issue came up, numerous people supported it, but nobody |
| 10 |
> followed through to get the list created. This time, I'm going to file |
| 11 |
> a bug to the infra team to make it happen. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> What's this mean for you? If you want to ignore -dev, you can just |
| 14 |
> subscribe to -dev-announce. But you will lose your ability to |
| 15 |
> participate in discussions leading toward decisions. If you have an |
| 16 |
> announcement relevant to development, post it to both -dev |
| 17 |
> and -dev-announce. Replies will go only to -dev. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Thanks, |
| 20 |
> Donnie |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> 1. http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_136761.xml |
| 23 |
> 2. |
| 24 |
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-announce/2007-June/msg00000.html |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
++ here. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Heck, I'm aiming for a -project list, and I see benefits in this too (details of |
| 29 |
reply-to munging discussions aside). So what's the harm in subscribing to a few |
| 30 |
more MLs? |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
--Kumba |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Gentoo/MIPS Team Lead |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
"Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: small hands |
| 39 |
do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are elsewhere." --Elrond |
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives