1 |
On Fri, May 30, 2014, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: |
2 |
> On 05/30/2014 11:10 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
3 |
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828 |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > I'll p.mask it on amd64 profiles if noone replies soon :( |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Please don't p.mask a working program because a config file is wrong. |
9 |
> The arch teams think the genkernel team should be updating the kernel |
10 |
> configs and vice-versa, so no one does it. I would be fine with |
11 |
> entirely removing the kernel configs in genkernel, but I assure you a |
12 |
> p.mask won't last long as it breaks releng and breaks users. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I'm super happy for you that you like dracut, but gentoo officially uses |
15 |
> genkernel and it shall not be p.masked due to an OPTIONAL config file. |
16 |
|
17 |
Makes sense; the suggestion to use releng configs also makes sense. No |
18 |
configs also works, given that the relevant sources package is usually |
19 |
patched within Gentoo, but a releng config would lead to more testing, |
20 |
and easier collaboration, one might hope. |
21 |
|
22 |
Though I'm at a loss as to how a package.mask is any less work than |
23 |
simply setting the string to ""; worrying about a changelong entry in |
24 |
an environment where everyone deliberately has commit to everything, |
25 |
seems inane. |
26 |
|
27 |
In any event, please move to simplify to one or none, rather than |
28 |
current 2, as you discussed in the bug. |
29 |
|
30 |
Regards, |
31 |
steveL |
32 |
-- |
33 |
#friendly-coders -- We're friendly, but we're not /that/ friendly ;-) |