Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jason Huebel <jhuebel@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] proposed solution to arches/stable problem
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:18:09
Message-Id: 200406221520.50178.jhuebel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] proposed solution to arches/stable problem by Aron Griffis
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Tuesday 22 June 2004 02:49 pm, Aron Griffis wrote:
5 > On the other hand, I'm not opposed completely to a specially marked
6 > keyword. But there are some things we need to realize: (1) each
7 > approach will have its pros and cons, (2) whichever approach we choose
8 > will likely compromise in one area to avoid compromising in another
9 > area...
10
11 And 3) there are exceptions to the rule. All I ask is that whatever decision
12 is made isn't a hard requirement. repoman complaining about who goes stable
13 first is fine, but don't make us use "-I". :-)
14
15 - --
16 Jason Huebel
17 Gentoo/amd64 Strategic Lead
18 Gentoo Developer Relations/Recruiter
19
20 GPG Public Key:
21 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9BA9E230
22
23 "Do not weep; do not wax indignant. Understand."
24 Baruch Spinoza (1632 - 1677)
25 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
26 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
27
28 iD8DBQFA2JShbNgbbJup4jARAhcZAKCbaNuDtWZ63+gNEgNpW3taU2zgBgCcDMQO
29 QOuy/TqubCo6USgY3RL2uNU=
30 =0HqV
31 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
32
33 --
34 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] proposed solution to arches/stable problem Aron Griffis <agriffis@g.o>