1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 02:49 pm, Aron Griffis wrote: |
5 |
> On the other hand, I'm not opposed completely to a specially marked |
6 |
> keyword. But there are some things we need to realize: (1) each |
7 |
> approach will have its pros and cons, (2) whichever approach we choose |
8 |
> will likely compromise in one area to avoid compromising in another |
9 |
> area... |
10 |
|
11 |
And 3) there are exceptions to the rule. All I ask is that whatever decision |
12 |
is made isn't a hard requirement. repoman complaining about who goes stable |
13 |
first is fine, but don't make us use "-I". :-) |
14 |
|
15 |
- -- |
16 |
Jason Huebel |
17 |
Gentoo/amd64 Strategic Lead |
18 |
Gentoo Developer Relations/Recruiter |
19 |
|
20 |
GPG Public Key: |
21 |
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9BA9E230 |
22 |
|
23 |
"Do not weep; do not wax indignant. Understand." |
24 |
Baruch Spinoza (1632 - 1677) |
25 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
26 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
27 |
|
28 |
iD8DBQFA2JShbNgbbJup4jARAhcZAKCbaNuDtWZ63+gNEgNpW3taU2zgBgCcDMQO |
29 |
QOuy/TqubCo6USgY3RL2uNU= |
30 |
=0HqV |
31 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |