Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@g.o>
To: bman@g.o, gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] On dropping sparc@ from CC on bugs
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 07:43:35
Message-Id: 20170911084313.2cf9f40e@sf
1 On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 22:18:08 +0000
2 bugzilla-daemon@g.o wrote:
3
4 > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the person
5 > whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug, please visit:
6 >
7 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=621130
8 >
9 > Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o> changed:
10 >
11 > What |Removed |Added
12 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
13 > CC|sparc@g.o |
14 >
15 > --- Comment #16 from Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o> ---
16 > sparc was dropped to exp.
17 >
18 > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=b5901d8f716555a1479f12313a2925fcadd177a9
19
20 [ CCed gentoo-dev@ to raise general awareness ]
21
22 Why do you need to drop sparc@ from CC on all the bugs?
23
24 It takes away possibility from users using sparc@ to report
25 test status easily. Even after the bug is closed.
26
27 sh@ and s390@ are also exp profiles and CC is one of mechanisms
28 to ask arch teams to try keywording/stablereq.
29
30 --
31
32 Sergei

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: On dropping sparc@ from CC on bugs Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o>