Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@g.o>
To: bman@g.o, gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] On dropping sparc@ from CC on bugs
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 07:43:35
Message-Id: 20170911084313.2cf9f40e@sf
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 22:18:08 +0000
bugzilla-daemon@g.o wrote:

> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the person > whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug, please visit: > > > > Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC|sparc@g.o | > > --- Comment #16 from Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o> --- > sparc was dropped to exp. > >
[ CCed gentoo-dev@ to raise general awareness ] Why do you need to drop sparc@ from CC on all the bugs? It takes away possibility from users using sparc@ to report test status easily. Even after the bug is closed. sh@ and s390@ are also exp profiles and CC is one of mechanisms to ask arch teams to try keywording/stablereq. -- Sergei


Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: On dropping sparc@ from CC on bugs Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o>