1 |
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 12:01:19PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, 8 May 2008 03:57:16 -0700 |
3 |
> Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> > On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 02:03:45AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
5 |
> > > Requested attendees |
6 |
> > > =================== |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > > PMS: ciaranm, pkgcore dev, portage dev, any other tools that care |
9 |
> > > about versions |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > Might I suggest that if PMS is going to be discussed, a copy of |
12 |
> > PMS.pdf actually be available somewhere? Preferably with the |
13 |
> > kdebuild-1 crap stripped out... |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Might I suggest that you read the agenda rather than going completely |
16 |
> off topic like last time? |
17 |
|
18 |
If PMS is going to be discussed in some form, it's a fair request that |
19 |
folks have an easily readable version. |
20 |
|
21 |
Insane enough, loosening the 8 digit version restriction can have |
22 |
other implications- very least, verifying that bash 3.0 is when [[ ]] |
23 |
support was introduced since [ ] breaks down for long long from a |
24 |
quick look. That's off the top of the head- could be more. Actually |
25 |
having a pdf to read would make that a helluva lot easier too. |
26 |
|
27 |
Course, it's way more fun to just bitch at me then build a pdf so |
28 |
others can look at the current spec for the discussion at hand (bugs |
29 |
are one thing, looking at the actual spec is another). |
30 |
|
31 |
One thing I wouldn't mind the council discussing is whether or not the |
32 |
recent behaviour re: pms on -dev is acceptable for running a project- |
33 |
it's not exactly engendering cooperation. Feel free to delay that |
34 |
till the next month, or ignore it (y'alls court after all). |
35 |
|
36 |
~brian |