Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:01:36
Message-Id: 200703251058.10935.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Sunday 25 March 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote:
3 > > On Saturday 24 March 2007, Matthias Langer wrote:
4 > > > In my opinion, any project that has reasonable potential to improve
5 > > > Gentoo as a whole
6 > >
7 > > which doesnt apply here
8 >
9 > Did you not say that finding alternatives to Portage is one of Gentoo's
10 > priorities?
11
12 no i did not, nor does that apply here
13
14 the idea that "Python bindings for Paludis" improves Gentoo as a whole is
15 laughable and completely irrelevant to the topic of PMS
16 -mike

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis "Piotr JaroszyƄski" <peper@g.o>