1 |
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 09:44:09AM +0100, Micha?? Górny wrote |
2 |
|
3 |
> All that said, if we really have a problem that needs solving here, I'm |
4 |
> not convinced MISC is the right solution for it. If people need to |
5 |
> explicitly exclude stuff, then I suppose the configuration-injected |
6 |
> ignore list is much better solution for this. |
7 |
|
8 |
An example of stuff you'd run into; my make.conf has the line... |
9 |
PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS="--exclude-from=/etc/portage/rsync_excludes" |
10 |
|
11 |
I've attached a script that I run whenever I add a directory to the |
12 |
exclusion list. It's specific to me, ie. program categories I don't |
13 |
use. It deletes the specified portage dirs, and updates the exclusion |
14 |
file. It really speeds up "emerge --sync" on my ancient Atom netbook |
15 |
with 2 gigabytes of ram. Will there still be an option to cycle through |
16 |
all existing top-level subdirectories of /usr/portage and check against |
17 |
the directory manifests? |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
21 |
I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications |