1 |
* John Myers <electronerd@×××××××××××××.net> schrieb: |
2 |
> On Wednesday 02 August 2006 16:12, Enrico Weigelt wrote: |
3 |
> > * Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> schrieb: |
4 |
> > > I've masked net-im/aim, AOL's proprietary offering. It hasn't seen a |
5 |
> > > release in years, it's binary-only, and it's far less capable than any |
6 |
> > > other client out there. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > BTW: could be introduce an separate (optional) masking method |
9 |
> > for such proprietary stuff ? |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> I believe (don't have time to check right now) you'll want to |
12 |
> look into ACCEPT_LICENSE |
13 |
|
14 |
Not necessarily. Licenses are not the only reason why someone |
15 |
likes to kick off binary-only packages. Also matters of stability, |
16 |
binary compatibility performance, etc. |
17 |
|
18 |
For example an statically-linked package (not compiled by gentoo devs) |
19 |
can introduce stability issues on hardly optimized systems, ie. |
20 |
libc w/o old ABIs, trimmed calling convention (enforced register passing), |
21 |
etc, etc. There're lots of things which can be optimized that break |
22 |
the ABIs. Binary-Only packages have a large risk of failing here. |
23 |
|
24 |
As an power-user (whom I have to be to know how to actually use |
25 |
these optimizations ;-)) I'd like to have a switch to kick 'em off |
26 |
or at least let emerge warn me. |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
cu |
30 |
-- |
31 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
32 |
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ |
33 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
34 |
Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: |
35 |
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce |
36 |
Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: |
37 |
http://patches.metux.de/ |
38 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
39 |
-- |
40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |