Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New category proposal

[Georgi Georgiev]

maillog: 11/05/2005-10:33:23(-0500): Brian Harring types
> The original request was having a package turn up in multiple
> categories for searching, right?

Actually, that was a side effect. The original request was to stop
moving packages around, which is the most annoying part and is also the
part that consumes a lot of effort. After all, this started as a result
of a discussion about the new name of a category. There were also talks
about whether some package should be in here or there... Having a flat
tree is one way to solve the discussed problem and which would also
allow me to find some package quickly. The flat tree request I, at
least personally, am willing to drop if you offer an alternative
solution to the keep-them-package-atoms-fixed-once-and-for-all problem.
Ahem, by an "atom" in this sentence I was referring to the CP part of
CPV.

-- 
\/   Georgi Georgiev   \/ When all other means of communication        \/
/\    chutz@×××.net    /\ fail, try words.                             /\
\/  [phone]   \/                                              \/