| 1 |
Henrik Treadup said: |
| 2 |
> Alan wrote: |
| 3 |
> # |
| 4 |
> #Or filter the list through spamassassin before it goes out to mailman (or |
| 5 |
> #something like that). |
| 6 |
> # |
| 7 |
> #alan |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> But spamassassin is sloooooow. It also uses a human generated rulebase. |
| 11 |
> http://www.spamassassin.org/tests.html |
| 12 |
> Lots of work for humans which is bad :( |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> What we wan't is a rulebase specifically tailored to the gentoo lists. (If |
| 16 |
> a mail contains the word 'ebuild' it is probably not spam and if it |
| 17 |
> contains the word 'madam' it probably is) |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Bayesian filtering takes care of generating the rulebase automatically. |
| 21 |
> This is a Good Thing (TM). |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Bayesian Filtering /rocks/! I've written a Bayesian spam filter for |
| 24 |
SquirrelMail based on the article you mention further down, and it's great. |
| 25 |
I don't see the spam on mailing lists anymore, because the filter catches it |
| 26 |
and filters it to another folder. Too bad I still get to see everyone |
| 27 |
talking about how much spam sucks. ;) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Read 'A plan for spam' http://www.paulgraham.com/spam.html and you will |
| 32 |
> see the light ;) |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> Where would be the correct place to have a discussion about this BTW? |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> /Henrik Treadup |
| 38 |
> hetr9922@××××××××××.se |
| 39 |
> _______________________________________________ |
| 40 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 41 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 42 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
Archives