Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ian Delaney <idella4@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 09:52:04
Message-Id: 20160124175138.1d179d11@archtester.homenetwork
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings by "Michał Górny"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA512
3
4 On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:45:20 +0100
5 Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
6
7 > On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 17:25:02 +0000
8 > Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> wrote:
9 >
10 > > On 2016.01.21 16:53, William Hubbs wrote:
11 > [...]
12 > [...]
13 > [...]
14 > [...]
15 > [...]
16 > [...]
17 > [...]
18 > [...]
19 > [...]
20 > [...]
21 > [...]
22 > [...]
23 > [...]
24 > [...]
25 > [...]
26 > [...]
27 > [...]
28 > [...]
29 > [...]
30 > [...]
31 > [...]
32 > >
33 > > There is no point in removing unmaintained but perfectly functional
34 > > software from the tree. It needs to be both unmaintained and
35 > > broken. Broken being evidenced by at least one open bug.
36 >
37 > That's nonsense. In fact, that's exactly the opposite of what should
38 > be removed.
39 >
40
41 So take the long standing President of the Board of Trustees who began
42 gentoo likely when you were still in school, peruse, and without
43 hesitation, with the opening line, declare the cited benchmark of
44 evidence as nonsense.
45
46 Sighs, and groans.
47
48
49 > If I see a package that clearly doesn't build or otherwise simply
50 > doesn't work, could not have worked for past 3 years, are you forcing
51 > me to waste a time reporting a bug to no maintainer who could fix it?
52 >
53
54 Surely no.
55
56 > Because to me, the lack of any open bugs is a clear evidence that
57 > the package is not only unmaintained, but also unused.
58 >
59 >
60
61 This is the way it really is, obviously. Well, to be fair; "Because to
62 me", so not quite. But I can't help being of the impression
63 that because you think so, it must in fact BE.
64
65 Happily, master Neddy being as capable as he is with management of such
66 expression, has already retorted to the description of his conclusion
67 as nonsense as, well, nonsense.
68
69 - --
70 kind regards
71
72 Ian Delaney
73 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
74 Version: GnuPG v2.1
75
76 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWpJ6rXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
77 ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCRUI4RjAxNzRGRTVDMjI4RjcxNkRFNzIw
78 QzQzN0NCNDcxRTlEMzNBAAoJEAxDfLRx6dM68qIQAMaiuJwwU9hUtJwfO5AwjGHM
79 Yukp7mib/MAHUCHExfNTrGQ/rlgOmzgG1gmx75Ruh6utia4xz3Xlcp4VkVWcyZER
80 StuRAXCuL874aUW4iSRL0fSAXK38L7AfvHs+3RVzV9Dr1DhPIUdIwwdmbLE25AEY
81 BSDcRDPSnkmDn9+ifuO/s+/lH7quQRugkS6LPDxB37Vnbi6yudrUpNB8x+B4IRb9
82 F9hgB0GXOhAAR8z1z2avf5f5yzKXp93tDwfxfl2uOMs3iUm3wedpaMyC+6YBkmsc
83 Flwu9gYfUVM957t5u84jUId4ckjyBYltZmCtzWoA6oQx0umPUkB4Q8R+p4azsTST
84 Vmr/9se0Em+QHXFDbTzQLiMuotKO6yRFhpQn2T8F46SEqI7OA+wrVmKmZXfdg2OH
85 CVV29X85uomLRGw0NrCwnKCQaKRUiFDwadjclfOBPy31LBMaNUoKsHdImjUgy1fA
86 r29oZsCVK16Io7fh9lWE2F6Q5uIsANaCNeGp+HqOd13xEvqSwW+NPRTxSD17uw4m
87 akdA1oTNiQoYfR6BUz14GXFc0oXH9zrO2TLZpRqnhjOIb8TGeaDyEuKfG95TD3mq
88 vSyPsNaaTp14tiEjLRy+S+vlxkGdovdK0dFOoVouFFFpz7sP38ngWOCdO92OoEeR
89 C7g32EiMSIoJrJe4VLOE
90 =wTau
91 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----