1 |
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 03:55:57 +0200, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Tim Yamin wrote: |
4 |
> >Speaking of which, has anybody done any tests with svk? |
5 |
> >(http://svk.elixus.org) |
6 |
> >And: http://svk.elixus.org/?WhySVK -- it would be interesting to compare |
7 |
> >checkout performance on it as well. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I've been planning to do a more detailed comparison of all the popular |
10 |
> SCM's out there for probably 6 months, but I just don't have the time |
11 |
> right now. If someone wants to pick this up, please let us know. |
12 |
|
13 |
The opensolaris project has done a similar thing[1]. The three finalists |
14 |
were bazaar[2], mercurial[3] and git[4], and the winner was eventually |
15 |
mercurial. This is also the recommended choice from the EuroBSDcon |
16 |
slides, so definitely something to consider. |
17 |
|
18 |
Regards, |
19 |
/Alexandre |
20 |
|
21 |
[1] http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/tools-discuss/2006-April/000366.html |
22 |
[2] http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/bzr-eval/ |
23 |
[3] http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/dcm_evaluation_mercurial/ |
24 |
[4] http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/git-eval.txt |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Hi, I'm a .signature virus! Please copy me in your ~/.signature. |