| 1 |
Le 2/10/21 à 9:04 PM, Frédéric Pierret a écrit : |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Le 2/10/21 à 6:57 PM, Andreas K. Hüttel a écrit : |
| 5 |
>> Hi all, |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> I'm announcing a new project here - "binhost" |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> "The Gentoo Binhost project aims to provide readily installable, precompiled |
| 10 |
>> packages for a subset of configurations, via central binary package hosting. |
| 11 |
>> Currently we are still in the conceptual planning stage. " |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Binhost |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> If you're interested in helping out, feel free to add yourself on the wiki |
| 16 |
>> page. |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> Note that I see actually *building* the packages not as the central point of |
| 19 |
>> the project (that could be e.g. a side effect of a tinderbox). I'm more |
| 20 |
>> concerned about |
| 21 |
>> * what configurations should we use |
| 22 |
>> * what portage features are still needed or need improvements (e.g. binpkg |
| 23 |
>> signing and verification) |
| 24 |
>> * how should hosting look like |
| 25 |
>> * and how we can test this on a limited scale before it goes "into production" |
| 26 |
>> * ... |
| 27 |
>> |
| 28 |
>> Comments, ideas, flamebaits? :D |
| 29 |
>> |
| 30 |
>> Cheers, |
| 31 |
>> Andreas |
| 32 |
>> |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> Hi Andreas, |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> I'm pretty interested to help for this topic. Notably, for my work on creating and maintaining Gentoo template for Qubes OS, I'm weekly constructing binpkgs mirrors in order to ease rebuilding from scratch Gentoo templates and also for CI purposes. So I would be glad to help the whole Gentoo community in such efforts. |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> I'm also following a very interesting work here on portage: https://github.com/gentoo/portage/pull/562 |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> Best regards, |
| 41 |
> Frédéric |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
Hi, |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
A quick update here, I'm currently testing and validating the work done in https://github.com/gentoo/portage/pull/562 in order to give some feedback to Zac hoping we could have this new feature for gpkg available soon in Portage. |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
If anyone wants to try, you just have to use @RinCat branch. I've simply emerged Portage by replacing in portage-9999.ebuild: |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
EGIT_REPO_URI="https://github.com/RinCat/portage.git" |
| 51 |
EGIT_BRANCH="gpkg" |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
and a quick make.conf example can be found in here: https://github.com/gentoo/portage/pull/562#issuecomment-797112962. |
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
As of today, the gpkg and signature are working properly. I'm currently building a Gentoo from scratch with this feature and then, I would use it as binhost with signature validation enabled. |
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
Best regards, |
| 58 |
Frédéric |
Archives