| 1 |
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 17:21, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 17 May 2006 17:13:31 +0200 Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> wrote: |
| 5 |
> | At this point I don't see that paludis is ready for such thing. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> How would you know? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> | In any case I think that optimally a package manager does not require |
| 10 |
> | its own profile. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Perhaps you should look at how much Portage stuff there is in the |
| 13 |
> profiles. The Portage-specific things are why Paludis needs its own |
| 14 |
> profile. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I couldn't find anything in the "default-linux/x86" profile. Could you |
| 17 |
perhaps point something out for me. I realise that there is a lot of |
| 18 |
*ebuild* specific stuff there. That has more to do with what an ebuild is |
| 19 |
than what portage does though. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Paul |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 25 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 26 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 27 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives