| 1 |
On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 00:09:12 Wernfried Haas wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 09:26:41AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Unfortunately, what the GLEP doesn't do is prevent the Council from |
| 4 |
> > having secret meetings and refusing to discuss not only the content of |
| 5 |
> > those meetings but even the topic. Perhaps a requirement that any |
| 6 |
> > Council meeting logs be made public would be useful, with a waiver |
| 7 |
> > that the Council can have a secret meeting if it officially announces |
| 8 |
> > that it is doing so? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> If they want to have sekrit meetings with sekrit handshakes, let |
| 11 |
> them. If enough people think this is not acceptable, they'll be gone |
| 12 |
> on the next election. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
If Gentoo goes all political and ties itself up in hundreds of rules, |
| 15 |
regulations, and miles of the proverbial red tape it will cease to be |
| 16 |
effective, and become a fork target to be effectively taken over by |
| 17 |
somebody or other with superiour people and technical skills. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Don't the names Debian, Shuttleworth, and Ubuntu ring bells? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
CS |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives