Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o>
To: peter@×××××.se
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 23:51:58
Message-Id: 20140124005040.350249c9@TOMWIJ-GENTOO
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy by Peter Stuge
1 On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 23:42:28 +0100
2 Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote:
3
4 > Tom Wijsman wrote:
5 > > you shoot down solutions
6 >
7 > Maybe it wasn't a very good solution that deserved to be shot down.
8
9 Maybe it was; what is needed here, is the feedback that makes it better.
10
11 Work towards a very good solution deserves more than a plain /dev/null;
12 if they end up in /dev/null when provided, solutions appear unwelcome.
13
14 Constructivism has to come from both sides to have an useful discussion.
15
16 --
17 With kind regards,
18
19 Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
20 Gentoo Developer
21
22 E-mail address : TomWij@g.o
23 GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
24 GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy Steev Klimaszewski <steev@g.o>