1 |
On Friday 16 September 2005 18:16, Martin Schlemmer wrote: |
2 |
> I do not think its so urgent? Either way, we have elibs approved now, |
3 |
> so how about waiting a while so that we do not have yet another elib |
4 |
> candidate to port? |
5 |
There are at least two ebuilds in portage that uses cp --parente . It wasn't |
6 |
being a problem if it wasn't used. |
7 |
|
8 |
elib can be approved, but we're working on Gentoo/*BSD (and Gentoo/OSX) now, |
9 |
not 4 years from now (ok that was an exageration, but simplify what the |
10 |
problem is: it doesn't seem probable that a newer portage goes out working |
11 |
and ebuilds start using the new features in a little time. |
12 |
|
13 |
Remember that we had a bit of opposition also to have gcc using USE_EXPAND-ed |
14 |
variables, I can't figure what would happen also if tomorrow we find a |
15 |
portage with elib working :/ |
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò |
19 |
Gentoo Developer - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ |
20 |
(Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64, Sound, PAM) |