Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Fabio Erculiani <lxnay@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-kernel] Proper distribution integration of kernel *-sources, patches and configuration.
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 20:28:45
Message-Id: CAN3Atvr7_At1Gt2PoUX=_c7Dvd--qY1Q_oDS6Jy6pPOyKzTuRg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-kernel] Proper distribution integration of kernel *-sources, patches and configuration. by Christoph Junghans
1 On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Christoph Junghans <ottxor@g.o> wrote:
2 > 2013/7/1 Fabio Erculiani <lxnay@g.o>:
3 >> I believe that end users would benefit more from kernel binary ebuilds
4 >> (ebuilds building an actual kernel with an official config), rather
5 >> than all this.
6 > +1
7 >
8 > The "binary" use flag for sys-kernel/*-sources in Funtoo implements
9 > exactly that.
10
11 [OT]
12 And why should you throw kernel sources at people as well? Separate
13 pkgs is much better. I don't want to have kernel sources on my servers
14 (for the same reason I don't want to have a compiler, and I've been
15 able to sort this out as well).
16 [/OT]
17
18 Sorry for the OT.
19
20 >
21 >>
22 >> --
23 >> Fabio Erculiani
24 >>
25 >
26 >
27 >
28 > --
29 > Christoph Junghans
30 > http://dev.gentoo.org/~ottxor/
31 >
32
33
34
35 --
36 Fabio Erculiani