| 1 |
On 1/7/06, Joshua Baergen <joshuabaergen@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Why not just create the directory in ${D} or ${IMAGE} and let Portage |
| 3 |
> handle the rest? Do you really want to be removing /afs unconditionally |
| 4 |
> on unmerge? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Because this results in this: (directory /t existed and /dev/cdrom was |
| 7 |
mounted to it while merging this) |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
>>> Merging sys-apps/test-0.2 to / |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
!!! Cannot write to '/t'. |
| 12 |
!!! Please check permissions and directories for broken symlinks. |
| 13 |
!!! You may start the merge process again by using ebuild: |
| 14 |
!!! ebuild /usr/portage/sys-apps/test/test-0.2.ebuild merge |
| 15 |
!!! And finish by running this: env-update |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
You suggest keeping the /afs dir, this would be an easy solution of |
| 18 |
course, but it does seem untidy, doesn't it? (Makes me think of the |
| 19 |
windows uninstallers saying "not all files could be removed, have a |
| 20 |
nice day") |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Stefaan |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives