| 1 |
> Hello people, |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> as the discussion about glep55 has gone in circles long enough I decided to |
| 4 |
> collect the various ideas presented around that theme complex and compare |
| 5 |
> them in a way that might allow us to reach a sane decision. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Since it has become quite a lot of text I've kept some parts in sentence |
| 8 |
> fragments and bullet points. If anyone feels the need to change that into |
| 9 |
> more verbose wording feel free to do so, I hope the idea is clear enough. I |
| 10 |
> feel it is still a draft and could use some massaging. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> If I should have forgotten any approach or misrepresented one I'd |
| 13 |
> appreciate an updated or rephrased section so it can be easily updated. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> For anyone not interested in reading the whole thing, the conclusion is |
| 16 |
> that we want to have the eapi in an easily parsed form in the ebuilds. The |
| 17 |
> versioning rule change discussion (mostly glep54) should happen in an |
| 18 |
> independent discussion. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> hth, |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Patrick |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Thanks for that :) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I am so on board with nihilists' proposal but if this is not accepted, haubis' |
| 27 |
seems the most clean solution to me. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
I really dont like the idea of changing the file extension in anyway since |
| 30 |
.ebuild is something that defines Gentoo. It is like changing .deb for Debian |
| 31 |
:P. Somethings must stay untouched. |
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Markos Chandras (hwoarang) |
| 34 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [KDE/Qt/Sunrise/Sound] |
| 35 |
Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org |
Archives