Archives
Archives
| From: | Alin Nastac <mrness@g.o> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> |
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] implicit vs explicit dependencies |
| Date: | Mon, 23 Oct 2006 19:38:11 |
| Message-Id: | 453D193D.8050602@gentoo.org |
| 1 | Up till now, I relied on implicit dependencies (dependencies of my |
| 2 | dependencies). |
| 3 | Apparently now (see https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152534) we |
| 4 | should add every atom that an ebuild depends on to (R)DEPEND. |
| 5 | Which is the right way? |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] implicit vs explicit dependencies | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] implicit vs explicit dependencies | Simon Stelling <blubb@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] implicit vs explicit dependencies | Olivier Crete <tester@g.o> |