Archives
Archives
| From: | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: portage reliance on GNU objcopy ownership perseverance behavior in strip | ||
| Date: | Wed, 10 Feb 2021 02:02:41 | ||
| Message-Id: | 2912464ea67169f7dd3e1f5858cd73341e1d974b.camel@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: portage reliance on GNU objcopy ownership perseverance behavior in strip by "Fāng-ruì Sòng" |
||
| 1 | On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 17:53 -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote: |
| 2 | > (I replied via https://groups.google.com/g/linux.gentoo.dev/c/WG-OLQe3yng |
| 3 | > "Reply all" (which only replied to the list AFAICT) but I did not |
| 4 | > subscribe to gentoo-dev via the official |
| 5 | > https://www.gentoo.org/get-involved/mailing-lists/ so my reply is |
| 6 | > missing) |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Apologies for hijacking your post with a tangential question, but you |
| 10 | reminded me to ask: how did you notice this problem? Ultimately all |
| 11 | system executables (in $PATH) should be owned by (and writable only by) |
| 12 | root anyway; otherwise you get silly security vulnerabilities like "cat |
| 13 | ~/virus > /usr/bin/foo" as a regular user. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: portage reliance on GNU objcopy ownership perseverance behavior in strip | Manoj Gupta <manojgupta@××××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: portage reliance on GNU objcopy ownership perseverance behavior in strip | Fangrui Song <maskray@××××××.com> |