From: | Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rsync.gentoo.org rsync modules: gentoo-repo-changelog added, gentoo-x86-portage & gentoo-sec discontinued. | ||
Date: | Sun, 30 Oct 2016 08:48:24 | ||
Message-Id: | 20161030214736.584fb400@katipo2.lan | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] rsync.gentoo.org rsync modules: gentoo-repo-changelog added, gentoo-x86-portage & gentoo-sec discontinued. by "Robin H. Johnson" |
1 | On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 02:54:17 +0000 |
2 | "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> wrote: |
3 | |
4 | > They may or may not still be referenced |
5 | > by the thick Manifests. |
6 | |
7 | Surely they should not continue to be referenced, as being referenced |
8 | but not present would cause the entire package to be deemed invalid due |
9 | to failing integrity checks. |
10 | |
11 | Or am I mis-remembering that Changelogs not matching stored checksum |
12 | cause packages to evaporate? |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] rsync.gentoo.org rsync modules: gentoo-repo-changelog added, gentoo-x86-portage & gentoo-sec discontinued. | "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> |