Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov" <mva@×××.name>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] git.eclass, git-2.eclass... git-r1.eclass?
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:30:23
Message-Id: 521DDF3E.3020406@mva.name
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] git.eclass, git-2.eclass... git-r1.eclass? by "Michał Górny"
1 > 2. Kill EGIT_HAS_SUBMODULES and autodetect submodules,
2
3 I'm disagreed. Sometimes submodules, that repo suggests is unneded,
4 since they fetches external package, that specified as RDEP.
5
6 >
7 > 3. Kill EGIT_OPTIONS since it limits the possibility of changing eclass
8 > code,
9
10 :-/
11
12 > 4. Kill EGIT_MASTER (it's more trouble than benefit),
13
14 Only if EGIT_BRANCH will stay on it's place.
15
16 > 5. Possibly kill EGIT_PROJECT -- it won't be good enough anymore,
17
18 Why?
19
20 > 6. Kill EGIT_NONBARE and support bare checkouts only. Supporting two
21 > different layouts introduces a lot redundant code.
22
23 AFAIR, that was issues (including shallow clones and so on), that
24 refuses to use bare repo.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies