Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Maurice van der Pot <griffon26@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Living in a bubble [gentoo-proctor] Warning^2
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:43:55
Message-Id: 20070606174014.GG9204@kfk4ever.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Living in a bubble [gentoo-proctor] Warning^2 by Marien Zwart
1 On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 10:29:47AM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
2 > > So, how about using this incident as an opportunity for a calm
3 > > discussion about the mandate and role of the proctors? The proctors
4 > > clearly felt that they should shut down this thread _before_ things
5 > > got out of hand.
6
7 I whole-heartedly agree with this.
8
9 It is probably safe to assume that everyone would like Gentoo to find a
10 system that works to prevent and/or put out flames. In the process of
11 figuring out the proper way, we are bound to make mistakes. We can't
12 expect ourselves to come up with a complete and perfect plan in advance
13 and live happily ever after.
14
15 Why not just assume a mistake was made when you don't agree with
16 something like this and then either wait for the specified period or go
17 to the proctors mailing list to explain how you think it could have been
18 better handled?
19
20 Why would an action by the proctors like this one make you want to quit
21 Gentoo altogether? Suppose that after discussion the proctors would
22 agree with you that it should have been handled differently and that
23 they made a mistake, would that have had a lasting effect on your
24 motivation? I can't imagine it would have.
25
26 On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 06:06:14PM +0200, Marien Zwart wrote:
27 > People really need to make up their mind about what the -dev ml *is*.
28 > If the proctors are not supposed to keep the discussions there mostly
29 > focused on technical matters and keep people from attacking each other
30 > (I quote again: "Clean the sand out of your pee-hole..."? does that
31 > really belong on a technical list like this?) then that should be made
32 > a lot more obvious than it currently is.
33
34 I agree that the proctors should just use their best insight to
35 determine if something is ok for a technical list. This will inevitably
36 mean that sometimes some posts will be incorrectly tagged as over the
37 line, but the worst that will do is to ruin a joke. Of course you'll be
38 annoyed that your joke was misunderstood, but for the good of the list
39 just suck it up and move along. It will not prevent this list from
40 fulfilling its purpose of being a place to discuss technical issues,
41 which is the most important thing if you ask me.
42
43 Regards,
44 Maurice.
45
46 --
47 Maurice van der Pot
48
49 Gentoo Linux Developer griffon26@g.o http://www.gentoo.org
50 Creator of BiteMe! griffon26@××××××××.com http://www.kfk4ever.com