| 1 |
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 08:04:35AM +0900, Mamoru KOMACHI wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> As far as I understand naming policy from Gentoo Linux documentation I |
| 4 |
> think xdvik-22.40y_p1.ebuild is valid name (pkg = xdvik, ver = 22.40y, |
| 5 |
> suf = p1) |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I think you are right. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> Do I misunderstand naming policy or does it belong to |
| 10 |
> Portage bug? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
File a bug and wait if it's marked as invalid :-) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> How can I make an ebuild of xdvik-22.40y1? (I can name |
| 15 |
> it xdvik-22.40y-r2.ebuild as the last resort :-/ ) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Please don't do that. The -r? part just means versioning of the ebuild, |
| 18 |
not of the package itself. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Bye, Patrick |
Archives