Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Auto adding packages to world was -> Sets vs Meta ebuilds
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 04:43:56
Message-Id: assp.03660f93bb.20170712004346.2dfd1eb9@o-sinc.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Auto adding packages to world was -> Sets vs Meta ebuilds by "Sam Jorna (wraeth)"
1 On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 14:17:30 +1000
2 "Sam Jorna (wraeth)" <wraeth@g.o> wrote:
3 >
4 > --depclean is doing exactly what it is supposed to. If called with no
5
6 Problem is I was talking about removing packages directly. It served no
7 purpose in this discussion.
8
9 Since I use --depclean, not -c. I was assuming -c was unmerge like -C,
10 but it is not. Others brought that up and sidetracked things. I just
11 did not catch and mistakenly went down that wormhole.
12
13 >
14 > > It is not the same as -C, which is remove a package directly.
15 > >
16 > > --unmerge (-C)
17 >
18 > Correct, --unmerge will remove a package without considering
19 > dependencies (give or take a few special cases). It is usually (or, at
20 > least, should generally be) reserved for those taking a hammer to a
21 > problem or with a particular desire to recover a broken system.
22 >
23 > Again, it's doing exactly what it's supposed to - removing a package
24 > you've told it to remove (unless it's one of the few
25 > almost-always-critical packages).
26
27 Yes and if you see bug. All I am saying is adding warnings when someone
28 goes to remove a dependency. Since a dependency IS a critical package :)
29
30 Add warning message when -C/--unmerge a dependency like system,
31 profile, and set files.
32 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624630
33
34
35 --
36 William L. Thomson Jr.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Auto adding packages to world was -> Sets vs Meta ebuilds "Sam Jorna (wraeth)" <wraeth@g.o>