| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> Linking with as-needed is the stage in which the elimination occurs, |
| 3 |
> and as-needed is the cause of the elimination. So yes, it is related. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
The linker just does bookkeeping, if there aren't symbols used, the |
| 6 |
library won't be in the list. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
>> Still, PE and ELF are older than the first C++ spec so, IFF your |
| 9 |
>> reading of this chapter is correct, C++ is broken by design. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Not at all. Read "The Design and Evolution of C++", and you shall see |
| 12 |
> that requiring changes to the linker where necessary for sensible |
| 13 |
> behaviour was considered acceptable, and with good reason. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
As in "we have a square wheels, let's make routes for them"... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Anyway is the book a standard? Is it available as pdf so you can point |
| 18 |
me the exact paragraph? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
lu - changing the world so non euclidean aberrations fit isn't sensible |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Luca Barbato |
| 25 |
Gentoo Council Member |
| 26 |
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC |
| 27 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives