| 1 |
This is great really great. I have not really much time to play with this. But I |
| 2 |
could help you in parts of to do work. Contact me and we could do it. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
I think it's enough to create acl's for the basesystem and some special |
| 5 |
server apps. All these kde and gnome apps must not be installed on a real |
| 6 |
server I think - so you need no acl's here. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Greetings |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Sebastian |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Am 06.03.2002 18:43:28, schrieb Joachim Blaabjerg <styx@×××××.org>: |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
>Hi again, people, |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
>If you don't have any further ideas/thoughts/objections/whatever, I'll |
| 17 |
>finally start working on Secure Gentoo (or whatever the name is) now. |
| 18 |
>I've had a few time problems lately, so I'm sorry I haven't got started |
| 19 |
>earlier. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
>What I'm going to do: |
| 22 |
>* Make a profile with a small (minimal) set of apps, and slowly expand |
| 23 |
>it as I get more packages done/patched. |
| 24 |
>* Make a kernel patch, probably based on the Gentoo kernel, but with |
| 25 |
>GrSecurity, kerneli, a few netfilter patches etc. |
| 26 |
>* Patch packages with patches from the Owl GNU/*/Linux project (of which |
| 27 |
>I am lucky to be a currently idling developer), and make ACLs for each |
| 28 |
>app. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
>My original intent was to use LIDS, but I've somewhat changed my mind. |
| 31 |
>The ACL system in grsec has matured greatly lately, and I'm trying it |
| 32 |
>out as we speak. Have any of you got any experiences or thoughts on this |
| 33 |
>you want to share? |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
>I've got a few questions, too: |
| 36 |
>Will the Gentoo kernel use Andrea Arcangeli's VM or Rik van Riel's (-aa |
| 37 |
>or rmap)? |
| 38 |
>How will this be done practically? I'm thinking in particular about the |
| 39 |
>freeze, and the proposed unstable branch. |
| 40 |
>How paranoid should it be? My first plan was to create ACLs for each and |
| 41 |
>every binary and deny almost everything else, but that might be too |
| 42 |
>paranoid for most people. What do you think? How about three security |
| 43 |
>levels (no ACLs, normal ACLs and very strict ACls)? |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
>Any other thoughts and ideas will be greatly appreciated :) |
| 46 |
> |
| 47 |
>-- |
| 48 |
>Joachim Blaabjerg |
| 49 |
>styx@×××××.org |
| 50 |
>www.SuxOS.org |
| 51 |
> |
| 52 |
>_______________________________________________ |
| 53 |
>gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 54 |
>gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 55 |
>http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
| 56 |
> |
Archives