| 1 |
> 2) Tangental to the issue above, we've already talked about placing things |
| 2 |
> like GPG keys on the web site in XML format and pulling the other info (dev |
| 3 |
> name, location, projects, etc.) in via XML as well. Why is the fingerd |
| 4 |
> solution a better one? Items on the web site are updated hourly. I can't |
| 5 |
> think of too many cases where that type of freshness isn't timely enough. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Speaking of which, there had also been talk of adding gpg keys, |
| 8 |
etcetera, to each dev's ldap data. I'm fairly agnostic about having |
| 9 |
fingerd running, but I do agree that we should try to centralize that |
| 10 |
data as much as possible. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Best, |
| 13 |
g2boojum |
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o> |
Archives