| 1 |
On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 20:32:36 -0400 |
| 2 |
James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> What's up with md5-cache? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Every syn has to pull the entire md5-cache hierarchy over again, as if |
| 7 |
> some daemon re-creates every file every day, rather than only |
| 8 |
> re-writing those files which need updates and adding/removing those |
| 9 |
> which need that. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Heavy eclass modifications lately. If you sync less often than I do, |
| 12 |
you may think it's just broken -- but these are eclasses. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> Even if only the files metatdata changes, that still adds a |
| 15 |
> significant cost to an rsync. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I wonder when it will come to the point where git will be more |
| 18 |
efficient than rsync. Or maybe it would be already? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Best regards, |
| 22 |
Michał Górny |
Archives