| 1 |
Daniel Goller said: |
| 2 |
> although i am against overly tweaking CFLAGS, someone suggested |
| 3 |
> something that might be more sane to ask for: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> /etc/portage/packages.cflags |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> an easy way to maintain your cflags you worked so hard for to obtain, |
| 8 |
> you can trade them in the forums or ebay and then append to your file, |
| 9 |
> not much work to implement in my eyes, and all the testing work is done |
| 10 |
> by those who want it |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> this way those of you who want a per package set of CFLAGS get it w/o it |
| 13 |
> being an impossible task for gentoo to implement |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> now you just need to get someone to make this happen or say "no, not |
| 16 |
> even that will happen" |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> if the portage team picks it up, make sure to thank Magnade for the idea |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
[SNIP] |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
hehe - I'll thank Magnade and whoever came up with the |
| 23 |
/usr/portage/packages.env idea - as I definetely think the packages.env is |
| 24 |
the winner - as it does cover every env. var you'd want to set - and not |
| 25 |
just CFLAGS. Flexibility wins again :) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Regards, |
| 29 |
Klavs Klavsen, GSEC - kl@××××.dk - http://www.vsen.dk |
| 30 |
PGP: 7E063C62/2873 188C 968E 600D D8F8 B8DA 3D3A 0B79 7E06 3C62 |
| 31 |
See our managed CMS Hosting Service at http://www.VirkPaaNettet.dk |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
"Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly." |
| 34 |
--Henry Spencer |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives