1 |
On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 10:00:33 +0100 |
2 |
flameeyes@×××××.com (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> "Alec Warner" <antarus@g.o> writes: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > That being said I still don't see the usefulness here. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > You seem to think that using the existing APIs for this data is |
9 |
> > wrong, and I think the opposite, so I guess we will agree to |
10 |
> > disagree on this matter. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Yeah I still think that there is no point in requiring using of a |
13 |
> specific API when the same data can easily be available in a format |
14 |
> that is more or less parsable with ease in any modern (and non) |
15 |
> programming language. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Beside, I find expanding the HOMEPAGE syntax to allow more than one |
18 |
> link a bit ... overkill, if the same thing can be achieved in |
19 |
> metadata.xml... |
20 |
|
21 |
I find moving HOMEPAGE out of ebuilds to be a bit overkill. |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
gcc-porting, by design, by neglect |
26 |
treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect |
27 |
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |