From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) | ||
Date: | Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:32:44 | ||
Message-Id: | 20071220082938.4bf4cf3b@blueyonder.co.uk | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) by Donnie Berkholz |
1 | On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:38:01 -0800 |
2 | Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: |
3 | > Here's some other ideas for how to express EAPI. What if we: |
4 | > |
5 | > Used EAPI-named subdirectories instead of tagging it into the |
6 | > filename? |
7 | |
8 | Performance hit, and otherwise equivalent to using suffixes. |
9 | |
10 | > Used (and required) filesystem extended attributes? |
11 | |
12 | Unportable, unsyncable and unmaintainable. |
13 | |
14 | > Stuck ranges into metadata.xml for which EAPIs applied? |
15 | |
16 | No package manager required information can be in XML format. |
17 | |
18 | -- |
19 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) | Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> |