1 |
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 05:54, Duncan wrote: |
2 |
> Matthias Langer posted <1136952512.5741.5.camel@××××××××××.ruz-net>, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> excerpted below, on Wed, 11 Jan 2006 05:08:31 +0100: |
5 |
> > After reading the response for bug 118607, which i filed, i was |
6 |
> > woundering if there isn't a more appropriate default procedure for |
7 |
> > packages with no homepages then just leaving the invalid |
8 |
> > 'homepage-link' alone ... Shouldn't there be a way to tell portage |
9 |
> > that a certain package simply doesn't have a homepage ? Matthias |
10 |
> |
11 |
> There was a recent thread on this, probably a month or two ago. |
12 |
> Various devs offered various suggestions, most of which they've been |
13 |
> using in packages they maintain. Apparently repoman complains if the |
14 |
> variable isn't there, so devs simply put "none" or "" or |
15 |
> "http://www.gentoo.org" or their dev page address as the homepage. |
16 |
> Again, look around, you'll see these "solutions" and others, such as |
17 |
> leaving the stale address in place as in the case at hand. There's was |
18 |
> no single standard solution agreed to, as it appeared no one was |
19 |
> sufficiently interested to push one, figuring more important things, |
20 |
> like squashing real functionality bugs, was more important, with the |
21 |
> limited time every Gentoo dev has, being they are all volunteers. |
22 |
|
23 |
Better solution is to use something like the freshmeat directory, or if |
24 |
possible the directory of the webserver/ftp server where the packages get |
25 |
released. |
26 |
|
27 |
Paul |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Paul de Vrieze |
31 |
Gentoo Developer |
32 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
33 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |