| 1 |
R Hill wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>I think that a lot of people use stage 1 because they're under the impression |
| 4 |
>that they have to in order to change their CHOST on default-linux from |
| 5 |
>i386-pc-linux-gnu to i686-pc-linux-gnu. And unless something has changed |
| 6 |
>recently, to get an NPTL glibc they _do_ have to make that change [1]. If it's |
| 7 |
>made clear that there is absolutely no difference in the end btwn stage3 + |
| 8 |
>emerge -e world and stage1, maybe people would be less enthusiastic about using it. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
>--de. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
Well, I'm not expert for sure, quite a noobie really, but I did my |
| 16 |
install about 2 years ago. I did a stage 3 install and then did a |
| 17 |
emerge -ev world. I must admit though, I did actually read the manual |
| 18 |
several times before I started my install. I usually don't read the |
| 19 |
directions but hey, I didn't know crap about Gentoo, don't know much |
| 20 |
crap now either. :/ |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Some may need the option for a stage 1 but unless you are on one slow |
| 23 |
rig, emerge -ev world shortly after booting your new stable kernel |
| 24 |
shouldn't take to long then install everything else. Wouldn't that make |
| 25 |
everyone happy? Shouldn't that also give some devs some time to work on |
| 26 |
others things as well? Getting a sync past 50% with slowing to a crawl |
| 27 |
would be nice. Plenty of people complaining about that. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Don't beat me to much OK. Be gentle. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Dale |
| 32 |
:-) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
To err is human, I'm most certainly human. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives