| 1 |
Michał Górny schrieb: |
| 2 |
>> So maybe mask it, but not remove? |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Maybe it's time you realize that if you want something to stay, then you |
| 6 |
> need to actually *take it* and *fix it*. Keeping clearly broken stuff |
| 7 |
> so that every user could try jumping through a few hoops to build it has |
| 8 |
> no value. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I think it is a valid concern that removal of packages may sometimes be |
| 11 |
overzealous, and to better keep packages in the tree as long as they are |
| 12 |
useful and workarounds exist for build/runtime problems. Just in case of |
| 13 |
gnash there is really no benefit in keeping it. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Best regards, |
| 17 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Archives