| 1 |
Uhh just my two cents on this whoule proxy-dev stuff... I concede it |
| 2 |
_is_ a good idea and can have it's benefits, but I can't see it as an |
| 3 |
"alternative" to Sunrise... as an addition, that both exist and the user |
| 4 |
can use both channels, ok, but not as a 1:1 sobstitute to Sunrise. I'm |
| 5 |
not really sure the proxy-dev thing would even have success, cause it's |
| 6 |
already done now by many herds and people, both using overlay and/or |
| 7 |
privately (e-mail etc.), but they do it _only_ for stuff they are really |
| 8 |
intersted in, how many would just do this direct dev-to-user |
| 9 |
maintainershop for stuff they absolutely don't care for? Anyway I'm not |
| 10 |
against this, with the proxy herd, ml et all, it could imo be organized |
| 11 |
well and who's intersted can for sure communicate and work like he wants |
| 12 |
etc., I just cannot see this as a 1:1 alternative to Sunrise, and here I |
| 13 |
could have just misunderstood the first mail, maybe this wants to only |
| 14 |
be an additional project, another channel, not the only one? |
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Best regards, |
| 17 |
Luca Longinotti aka CHTEKK |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
LongiTEKK Networks Admin: chtekk@×××××××××.com |
| 20 |
Gentoo Dev: chtekk@g.o |
| 21 |
SysCP Dev: chtekk@×××××.org |
| 22 |
TILUG Supporter: chtekk@×××××.ch |
Archives