| 1 |
Yeah, I think a sub-domain may not be a good solution but unfortunately it |
| 2 |
is the best at present. The site is a good idea but nothing stops it from |
| 3 |
abuse. The suggestion that people are ATs for a short time before becoming |
| 4 |
full devs anyway is another reason for them to be give @g.o addresses. Leave |
| 5 |
adminstration to the least and give the specific volunteers with jobs |
| 6 |
addresses. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
If the need is to seperate the people with responsibility from those without |
| 9 |
then there is no real solution but to give them either sub domains or leave |
| 10 |
them outside the gentoo fold. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I think the website is a good idea but it would eventually mean that the ATs |
| 13 |
would get the job of testing the packages that the users say are ok so that |
| 14 |
the devs can concentrate on bugs |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
On 11/19/05, Corey Shields <cshields@g.o> wrote: |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> On Friday 18 November 2005 07:01 pm, George Prowse wrote: |
| 19 |
> > As these would be @gentoo.org <http://gentoo.org> <http://gentoo.org> |
| 20 |
> people they would be easier for devrel to tackle. Making them closer under |
| 21 |
> the gentoo wing justmakes them easier to dicipline. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> No, you misunderstood... In the theoretical site I was describing, they |
| 24 |
> would |
| 25 |
> be users.. not @gentoo.org <http://gentoo.org> ppl. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> -C |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> -- |
| 30 |
> Corey Shields |
| 31 |
> Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team |
| 32 |
> Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees |
| 33 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> |
Archives