From: | Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/ | ||
Date: | Sun, 21 May 2017 19:33:17 | ||
Message-Id: | 20170522073236.0bde74f5@katipo2.lan | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/ by "Michał Górny" |
1 | On Sun, 21 May 2017 19:34:26 +0200 |
2 | Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
3 | |
4 | > Like, by not using eclasses and instead inlining all the stuff? |
5 | |
6 | I'd personally suggest we endeavour towards making systems in place so |
7 | that the performance overheads of metadata generation is much lower, to |
8 | the point it can be done efficiently without needing cache |
9 | provisioning. |
10 | |
11 | But I'd also like a pony. |
12 | |
13 | ( I have ideas using daemons, inotify, and persistent databases as the |
14 | primary metadata layer instead of millions of files, but they're all |
15 | too complicated and hard ) |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/ | "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/ | "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org> |