Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/
Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 19:33:17
Message-Id: 20170522073236.0bde74f5@katipo2.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/ by "Michał Górny"
1 On Sun, 21 May 2017 19:34:26 +0200
2 Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > Like, by not using eclasses and instead inlining all the stuff?
5
6 I'd personally suggest we endeavour towards making systems in place so
7 that the performance overheads of metadata generation is much lower, to
8 the point it can be done efficiently without needing cache
9 provisioning.
10
11 But I'd also like a pony.
12
13 ( I have ideas using daemons, inotify, and persistent databases as the
14 primary metadata layer instead of millions of files, but they're all
15 too complicated and hard )

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/ "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/ "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org>