Archives
Archives
| From: | David Sparks <daves@×××××××××××.com> |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] non-QA'd ebuilds |
| Date: | Wed, 07 Apr 2004 16:40:08 |
| Message-Id: | 40742EA8.60400@ActiveState.com |
| 1 | Going by these bugs: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40831 |
| 4 | |
| 5 | http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47112 |
| 6 | |
| 7 | it seems that some ebuilds don't do the usual month long cycle at ~arch |
| 8 | before being promoted to arch status. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Is there a list of the apps that don't have to have their ebuilds QA'd |
| 11 | before being marked stable? |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Thanks! |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] non-QA'd ebuilds | Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o> |