| 1 |
On Wednesday 05 March 2008 14:59:55 Doug Goldstein wrote: |
| 2 |
> Thomas Anderson wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Wednesday 05 March 2008 14:41:32 Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> Thomas Anderson kirjoitti: |
| 5 |
> >>>> Please elaborate on how a "full.fledged developer" would differ from a |
| 6 |
> >>>> "package maintainer" technically. What requirements and/or |
| 7 |
> >>>> priviledges do you think could be reduced? |
| 8 |
> >>>> |
| 9 |
> >>>> Marius |
| 10 |
> >>> |
| 11 |
> >>> Perhaps there could be some honor code system at least, where the |
| 12 |
> >>> package maintainer would be restricted to their area of maintainership. |
| 13 |
> >> |
| 14 |
> >> This is the current situation. |
| 15 |
> >> |
| 16 |
> >> Regards, |
| 17 |
> >> Petteri |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > Exactly, only the "package maintainers" wouldn't have everything that a |
| 20 |
> > full dev would have... |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> What exactly wouldn't they get? What would differ them from Arch Testers? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Arch Testers don't have tree access. This proposal gives the package |
| 25 |
maintainer the ability to commit their changes. |
Archives